HOW ANTI-EVOLUTIONISTS ABUSE MATHEMATICS:

http://www.math.jmu.edu/~rosenhjd/sewell.pdf

Teorematy 5.2 i 5.3 są bezpośrednią polemiką z tezami Freda Hoyle’a – zmartwię Panią – jest to dyskurs… matematyczny, który kończy się tak:

Hoyle’s argument is wrong for many reasons, the most fundamental being the absurdity of extrapolating to geologic time a mathematical model that is reliable only for short-term data. [..] There are other problems. Early in his book Hoyle states, “...a considerable fraction of individuals born in every generation exhibit some new mutation, the great majority being harmful in some degree.” This premise is entirely false. As indicated earlier, most mutations are neutral.[...] This leads us to the most insidious aspect of Hoyle’s work. His book offers no index, no bibliography, and only the briefest mention of any other work in population genetics. Most of his book is spent rederiving old results, without giving any indication that they are not oroginal to him. A lay reader will inevitably get the impression that the formidable mathematical machinery employed by Hoyle, coupled with his dismissals of work that came before him, constitutes a devastating attack on Neo-Darwinism. It doesn’t.

Tak właśnie rozbijają Pani marzenia o klęsce teorii ewolucji. Przykro mi.